Skip to main content

Building the foundation: How I write knowledge organisers

In my last post, “Knowledge Organisers: the good, the bad and ugly”, I argued that while knowledge organisers can be a powerful tool of inclusion, they only work if they are focused, sequential and accessible.

When I first started writing knowledge organisers two years ago, my attempts did not even come close to meeting these criteria. As a result, they were cluttered, unfocused and ultimately an exercise in fashion over function. Since then, I have devised a standard method to ensure that any knowledge organisers I make have an impact and can be used in the long term:
  1. Identify key knowledge.
  2. Group your facts into sections.
  3. Write your sections.
  4. Number or code your sections.
  5. Quality assure your sections.
1.       Identify key knowledge
It’s easy to fall into the trap of including too much in a knowledge organiser, particularly when writing about topics we’re interested or about which we know a lot. We want to share our passion and subject knowledge with pupils and so often we fall into the trap of seeing everything we know as key.
This issue can be solved by working backwards; rather than thinking about what I want pupils to know, I try to think about the end goal, whether that is an exam, an assessment or a final piece of work.


The ultimate principle to remember is that knowledge organisers are a foundation. They are designed to support and reinforce the teaching you deliver in the classroom. Just because something isn’t in the knowledge organiser, doesn’t mean you can’t teach it.

This process can also be used to make sure that learning is an incremental process. Once I’ve mapped out what pupils need to understand, I can omit, scale back or make links between concepts which have been covered in previous topics or years.

2.       Sequence and group your knowledge.
Once I’ve identified the key knowledge, I sequence it into a logical order, building up to the final task. This process has the added bonus of essentially sketching out a scheme of work at the same time, while avoiding a focus on activities over content.


3.       Write your sections.
Each of the sub-topics which I identified in the sequencing stage now forms a ‘box’ in the knowledge organiser. When writing my knowledge organisers, I always try to come back to three key questions:
  1. Do students need to know this or do I want them to?
  2. What is the best way to present this information? I’m a big advocate of tables or diagrams over walls of text.
  3. Do any of these key terms need defining?

I try to highlight key words as I write each section and then go back and add definitions to the key words box. As I will discuss in my next blog about how I use knowledge organisers, I believe that key words should help pupils to access knowledge organisers, but are not necessarily part of them.
(Wherever possible, I also either make my own diagrams or use images which are licensed for reuse.)


4.       Number or code your sections.
This step is largely administrative. However, I find that it makes using knowledge organisers much more efficient and effective. Rather than organising topics by title, I organise them by code or number. This not only makes it much easier to set homework, but also remove excuses and confusion when it comes to what pupils are expected to focus on or use.





5.       Quality assure your sections.
The word’s “quality assurance” can often strike fear into the hearts of teachers and leaders alike. However, rather than looking at compliance, quality assuring knowledge organisers is an excellent opportunity to gauge their accessibility. The quality assurance within my department has two main steps:
  • Staff quality assurance: A faculty meeting in which each person quality assures someone else’s knowledge organiser. This process focuses on whether the administrative side of has been completed (coding and layout) and whether any necessary content has been missed. At the end of last year, this also served as an excellent opportunity to fill in gaps in my subject knowledge and have discussions with topic specialists.
  • Student quality assurance: A group of pupils reads through the knowledge organiser and gives feedback on the clarity and ease of comprehension of the document. During this stage it is vital to remember that although knowledge organisers should be as accessible as possible, this does not mean that the pupils should understand everything without your input.


Arguably, the most important thing to remember when writing knowledge organisers is that they should be the foundation of a good scheme or work, not a bolt-on. Following these steps and writing knowledge organisers well takes time. However, if done well, this is time well spent.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Knowledge Organisers: The Good, The Bad and the Ugly

The term "knowledge organiser" has been used a lot over the last few years. They are a tool of which I am a passionate advocate. However, opinions of them appear to be divided; While I have met many teachers who share my passion, others have been nonplussed or told me to 'just use a revision guide'. To me, knowledge organisers are the ultimate tool of inclusion. They will never replace the benefit of being taught by an expert. However, they create a situation in which every child, regardless of special need, attendance or socio-economic status, can have access to the core knowledge they need to succeed. However, this only happens if knowledge organisers are written well; I believe, in order to realise their benefits, knowledge organisers must be focused, sequential and accessible . Accessible: Many pupils will arrive at secondary school lacking in cultural capital, with a limited vocabulary or with little experience of subjects such as history or geog

Knowledge Organisers and Quizzing: Minimising the Matthew Effect

I believe that knowledge organisers can be the ultimate tool of inclusion. However, used poorly they can amplify the Matthew Effect, supporting most able while simultaneously disadvantaging those who need the most support. Put simply, they can cause the knowledge rich to get richer and the knowledge poor to get poorer. Over the four years which my department has used knowledge organisers, we have developed a number of techniques to minimise this effect and ensure that knowledge organisers benefit as many pupils as possible. Quiz questions: In order to encourage pupils to engage with the knowledge organisers, all of our homework is based around either answering quiz questions or practising quizzes which they have already completed. Originally, pupils wrote their own questions and answers. They were required to write a minimum of 7 questions and answers which the teacher would collect feedback on while they were completing their starters. Pupils would then have a set amount

The Battle of the Knowledge Organisers with metacognition.org.uk

The world of Knowledge Organisers is often a dichotomous one. Are you team ‘narrative’, or team ‘grid’? In this blog, Becky Sayers and Nathan Burns explore the purpose of both types, as well as their respective advantages, disadvantages and applicability across subjects. So place your bets, as the fight is about to start…!   Becky Sayers writes about the definition, purpose, advantages and disadvantages of the ‘narrative’   Knowledge Organiser. The ‘Narrative’ Knowledge Organiser Why do we use Knowledge Organisers? As a faculty, we have been using Knowledge Organisers for around seven or eight years. If I’m honest, the original reason I used them is because I was told to do so by a faculty leader in whom I had immense trust. I did not understand their overall purpose and, as a result, the pages I produced were fairly poor quality. However, over the years we have thought carefully as a team about their purpose and, as a result, the Knowledge Organisers we have produced as a te